<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- If you are running a bot please visit this policy page outlining rules you must respect. https://www.livejournal.com/bots/ -->
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:lj="https://www.livejournal.com">
  <id>urn:lj:livejournal.com:atom1:openvz</id>
  <title>OpenVZ</title>
  <subtitle>OpenVZ</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>OpenVZ</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://openvz.livejournal.com/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://openvz.livejournal.com/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2013-04-29T18:52:48Z</updated>
  <lj:journal userid="9392309" username="openvz" type="community"/>
  <link rel="service.feed" type="application/x.atom+xml" href="https://openvz.livejournal.com/data/atom" title="OpenVZ"/>
  <entry>
    <id>urn:lj:livejournal.com:atom1:openvz:43876</id>
    <author>
      <name>Kir Kolyshkin</name>
    </author>
    <lj:poster user="k001" userid="990679"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://openvz.livejournal.com/43876.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://openvz.livejournal.com/data/atom/?itemid=43876"/>
    <title>vzstats in beta</title>
    <published>2013-04-29T18:52:48Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-29T18:52:48Z</updated>
    <content type="html">For the last two weeks or so we've been working on vzstats -- a way to get some statistics about OpenVZ usage. The system consists of a server, deployed to &lt;a target='_blank' href='http://stats.openvz.org/' rel='nofollow'&gt;http://stats.openvz.org/&lt;/a&gt;, and clients installed onto OpenVZ machines (hardware nodes). This is currently in beta testing, with 71 servers participating at the moment. If you want to participate, read &lt;a target='_blank' href='http://openvz.org/vzstats' rel='nofollow'&gt;http://openvz.org/vzstats&lt;/a&gt; and run &lt;code&gt;yum install vzstats&lt;/code&gt; on your OpenVZ boxes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So far we have some interesting results. We are not sure how representative they are -- probably they aren't, much more servers are needed to participate-- but nevertheless they are interested. Let's share a few preliminary findings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First, it looks like almost no one is using 32-bits on the host system anymore. This is reasonable and expected. Indeed, who needs system limited to 4GB of RAM nowdays?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Second, many hosts stay on latest stable RHEL6-based OpenVZ kernel. This is pretty good and above our expectations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Third, very few run ploop-based containers. We don't understand why. Maybe we should write more about features you get from ploop, such as instant snapshots and improved live migration.</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
