<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- If you are running a bot please visit this policy page outlining rules you must respect. https://www.livejournal.com/bots/ -->
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:lj="https://www.livejournal.com">
  <id>urn:lj:livejournal.com:atom1:openvz</id>
  <title>OpenVZ</title>
  <subtitle>OpenVZ</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>OpenVZ</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://openvz.livejournal.com/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://openvz.livejournal.com/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2006-11-28T16:36:03Z</updated>
  <lj:journal userid="9392309" username="openvz" type="community"/>
  <link rel="service.feed" type="application/x.atom+xml" href="https://openvz.livejournal.com/data/atom" title="OpenVZ"/>
  <entry>
    <id>urn:lj:livejournal.com:atom1:openvz:9133</id>
    <author>
      <name>Kir Kolyshkin</name>
    </author>
    <lj:poster user="k001" userid="990679"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://openvz.livejournal.com/9133.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://openvz.livejournal.com/data/atom/?itemid=9133"/>
    <title>OpenVZ contributions to the kernel</title>
    <published>2006-08-22T10:07:39Z</published>
    <updated>2006-11-28T16:36:03Z</updated>
    <category term="kernel"/>
    <category term="contributions"/>
    <category term="openvz"/>
    <category term="mainstream"/>
    <content type="html">I just found out an interesting fact: from the 20 patches that are &lt;a href="http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/201" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;supposed to be included into the next stable 2.6.17.y&lt;/a&gt; (where y=10) kernel, &lt;s&gt;6&lt;/s&gt; 5 were done by OpenVZ developers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What it could mean, besides the fact that OpenVZ team is a valueable contributor to the mainstream kernel? It also means we do care much for stability and security of OpenVZ, we do a lot of testing and QA, which is good for OpenVZ kernel, but for the mainstream kernel as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a broader sense, this is a nice example of how collaborative open source development works. A nice example of “everybody wins” strategy. Indeed, in open source everybody wins.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a target='_blank' href='http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/205' rel='nofollow'&gt;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/205&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a target='_blank' href='http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/206' rel='nofollow'&gt;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/206&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a target='_blank' href='http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/209' rel='nofollow'&gt;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/209&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;s&gt;&lt;a target='_blank' href='http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/213' rel='nofollow'&gt;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/213&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/s&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a target='_blank' href='http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/219' rel='nofollow'&gt;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/219&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a target='_blank' href='http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/223' rel='nofollow'&gt;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/223&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a name='cutid1-end'&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Update&lt;/b&gt;: our kernel team found a bug in this blog post. Looks like the bug belongs to the infamous "off-by-one" category. :) There are actually 5 patches from OpenVZ developers, not 6 &amp;mdash; it's just Greg sent &lt;a href="http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/209" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;one patch&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/213" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;twice&lt;/a&gt; and thus I counted it twice. Fixed.</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
