<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<!--  If you are running a bot please visit this policy page outlining rules you must respect. https://www.livejournal.com/bots/  -->
<rss version='2.0'  xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>OpenVZ</title>
  <link>https://openvz.livejournal.com/</link>
  <description>OpenVZ - LiveJournal.com</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:07:39 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / LiveJournal.com</generator>
  <lj:journal>openvz</lj:journal>
  <lj:journalid>9392309</lj:journalid>
  <lj:journaltype>community</lj:journaltype>
  

  <item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://openvz.livejournal.com/9133.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:07:39 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>OpenVZ contributions to the kernel</title>
  <author>k001</author>
  <link>https://openvz.livejournal.com/9133.html</link>
  <description>I just found out an interesting fact: from the 20 patches that are &lt;a href=&quot;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/201&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;supposed to be included into the next stable 2.6.17.y&lt;/a&gt; (where y=10) kernel, &lt;s&gt;6&lt;/s&gt; 5 were done by OpenVZ developers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What it could mean, besides the fact that OpenVZ team is a valueable contributor to the mainstream kernel? It also means we do care much for stability and security of OpenVZ, we do a lot of testing and QA, which is good for OpenVZ kernel, but for the mainstream kernel as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a broader sense, this is a nice example of how collaborative open source development works. A nice example of “everybody wins” strategy. Indeed, in open source everybody wins.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a target=&apos;_blank&apos; href=&apos;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/205&apos; rel=&apos;nofollow&apos;&gt;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/205&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a target=&apos;_blank&apos; href=&apos;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/206&apos; rel=&apos;nofollow&apos;&gt;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/206&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a target=&apos;_blank&apos; href=&apos;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/209&apos; rel=&apos;nofollow&apos;&gt;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/209&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;s&gt;&lt;a target=&apos;_blank&apos; href=&apos;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/213&apos; rel=&apos;nofollow&apos;&gt;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/213&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/s&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a target=&apos;_blank&apos; href=&apos;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/219&apos; rel=&apos;nofollow&apos;&gt;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/219&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a target=&apos;_blank&apos; href=&apos;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/223&apos; rel=&apos;nofollow&apos;&gt;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/223&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a name=&apos;cutid1-end&apos;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Update&lt;/b&gt;: our kernel team found a bug in this blog post. Looks like the bug belongs to the infamous &quot;off-by-one&quot; category. :) There are actually 5 patches from OpenVZ developers, not 6 &amp;mdash; it&apos;s just Greg sent &lt;a href=&quot;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/209&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one patch&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/21/213&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;twice&lt;/a&gt; and thus I counted it twice. Fixed.</description>
  <comments>https://openvz.livejournal.com/9133.html?view=comments#comments</comments>
  <category>kernel</category>
  <category>contributions</category>
  <category>openvz</category>
  <category>mainstream</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:poster>k001</lj:poster>
  <lj:posterid>990679</lj:posterid>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
